Sony MDR-1000X Wireless Noise Canceling Headphones Page 2

Sony_MDR1000X_Photo_InCase

Sound Quality
I would basically characterize the Sony MDR-1000X as a modestly warm and pleasant sounding headphone. Bass is well extended and tight though slightly too emphatic and does very mildly intrude on the mids—though that may have more to do with the presence region of the upper mids being dialed back. Once above the presence region, the treble response is just a tad on the bright side of neutral, but it really doesn't sound bright at all with the presence area so subdued. The more audible issue for me is a somewhat grainy character that tends to obscure detail.

The clearly laid-back presence region is probably the worst sonic problem with these cans; they sound somewhat veiled because of it. The other two significant problems is a somewhat grainy character in the treble and an audible noise floor from the active circuitry. The overall listening experience, however technically flawed, is relaxed and pleasant.

Compared directly with the Bose QC 35, I felt the Bose bested the Sony with a more neutral character overall, and just a bit less grain to obscure details. Against the JBL Everest Elite 700 I felt the Sony was the more pleasing listen due to the somewhat forward nature of the JBL. From memory, I'd almost certainly take the veiled Sony over the somewhat annoyingly bright Sennheiser PXC 550.

Sound quality in all the active modes were quite similar, but sound quality in passive wired mode was substantially different and quite poor. Bass was far too emphatic and distorted sounding; the veiled presence region remained; mid-treble is slightly too emphatic; and the headphone seemed rather uneven overall. Poor performance in wired passive mode is the norm for this type of headphone, and the MDR-1000X is probably a bit better than the average in this mode. Given that many headphones of this type don't even allow a passive wired mode I'm glad Sony gave the option in case the batteries die.

Summary
The Sony MDR-1000X is an absolutely terrific looking and comfortable wireless, noise canceling headphone. The feature set includes controls to achieve various levels of isolation from the outside world. All levels of isolation can be instantly defeated by placing your right palm against the right ear cup, which mutes the music and opens mics to the outside world so you can quickly hear announcements or hold a short conversation with a flight attendant.

The MDR-1000X is Sony's first volley into the world of smart noise canceling headphones. They did well delivering a sound more pleasant than the Sennheiser PXC 550 or JBL Everest Elite 700, but the Bose Quiet Comfort 35 at the same price is markedly better sounding. Noise canceling of the Sony is better than Sennheiser or JBL, but not as good as the Bose or AKG N90Q.

The feature set and various isolation modes do work well and are effective in providing various useful levels of situational awareness. But the ergonomics and responsiveness of controls are a little clumsy. The Sennheiser PXC 550 slays it in this area, while the Bose is beginning to look a bit dated with it's simple feature set.

I like the Sony MDR-1000X—the sound is pleasant, the features attractive, and it's dead sexy looking—but at the same price I'd suggest the better sound quality, noise canceling, and comfort of the Bose QC 35 will better serve most folks. None the less, I'll happily recommend the Sony MDR-1000X for those who desire a more feature rich headphone.

Video

Resources
Sony home page and MDR-1000X product page.
Head-Fi.org reviews and thread here, here, here, and here.
Superbestaudiofriends.org thread here.

COMPANY INFO
Sony Electronics Inc.
(201) 930-1000
ARTICLE CONTENTS

COMMENTS
zubkabera's picture

I have never come across any site or hifi magazine which has denied the fact that Sony has trumped Bose on Noise cancellation. Even Steve Guttenberg has acknowledged also all believe the SQ although on warm side beats Bose. So either your unit was defected or you've made a bad call ;)

Pro7omize's picture

Yeah, this review is of a defective pair. The Sony's sound better than the QC35 to my ears and everyone else I let hear when comparing the two.

Apothecary2's picture

Or maybe people have different preferences.

Tyll Hertsens's picture
Well, the first half of your comment is simply invalidated by the measurements. The Bose simply has better isolation than the Sony. Regarding the second half of your comment, if they can't get it right on something that's relatively easy to measure, I don't really expect them to get the more subjective things right. It's possible folks are just tired of saying Bose is the best and want a band wagon to jump on.

The Sony is good sounding, just not as good, IMO.

steaxauce's picture

Hi Tyll, I enjoyed your review. I'm a little surprised you didn't like these as much as I did, but I agree they're a little veiled. Haven't gotten to try the QC35.

I wonder if this method for measuring isolation is sufficient for active headphones. Is it possible some of these circuits have an easier time with constant background noise than with transient sounds like voices? I remember another reviewer saying the Bose worked better on planes, but the Sony did better in other places, like at the office.

This review also makes me pretty confident that both the N90Qs I've received have been faulty. They both had significantly higher background noise than the 1000X and weren't nearly as good as noise cancelling. I'm sure a working one would be great, but I'm about ready to give up on that headphone.

brause's picture

Got the QC-15 on frequent flyer points. Will outlast all the above models as its AAA battery is replaceable. Good enough!

Spankey00's picture

I waited for this review for some time and I'm happy to find that Tyll's findings were the same as mine. The headphones were not defective at all. These are very good headphones but I found the mods to be veiled. Vocals had a bit less bite. I A/B'ed the Sony's with the Bose for an entire weekend listening to as many different styles of music possible. The QC35's were always the more natural sounding headphone. The Sony's were a bit more "processed". This review was right on. My ears are in good company.

dreamer2976's picture

I desperately wanted to like Sony MDR-1000x for its rich feature set. But alas, after A/B-ing over a few occasions over a period of 2 months, I decided to go for Bose Qc35 due to: 1. Superb comfort (no other closed headphones can match QC35's comfort, 2. Simplicity and Reliability (it just works! Bluetooth connection is stable and strong, buttons are easily to operate and they just do what i wanted - play, pause, fast forward, rewind, take a call, end a call, operate Siri, check battery %, volume up, volume down. No gimmick, they just work, phew!), 3. Sound quality (while many online reviewers have preferred 1000x, I find them too "processed" and uneven, almost unpredictable). They sound good for some songs, but would be too bass heavy or too bright for others. The QC35's are neutral and natural sounding, with good details and reasonable bass. They obviously can't compare with my Focal Utopia or Senn HD800, but the QC35's are darn good at they should do -- being a pair of excellent sounding and comfortable wireless noice-cancelling headphones.

Dadracer's picture

I found the Bose QC25 and 35 to still have the best NC. In comparison to the Sonys in terms of sound quality I could not pick a winner as the Sony had better bass and the Bose better midrange and neither one had a great treble. So I tried the Sennheiser PXC550 and preferred these despite the dire warnings of a spiky treble. The Sennheiser still don't have quite as good NC as the Bose but the sound quality is a deal better and they image better too. Just my experience.......

david smith89's picture

It's a good piece of information. High intensity content and it is presented in a good manner. Hopefully waiting for your next post.

walmartone |

walmartone login

larryblock's picture

I feel as though Sony's ANC products in the last couple years have kinda gone off their rockers into some questionable choices. This concerns two products: the overhead 1000X, and Sony's most modern in-ear ANC product, the MDR-EX750NA.

Compared to last-gen Sony ANC products, it's like they chose a specific kind of ANC "white noise" to appeal to some people's hearing, so that the effect appears stronger than it really is. So when the EX750NA came out, a lot of less-experienced accounts started to go on and on about how it's stronger than the QC20 - except it's not. Even with a dual-mic (both feed-back and feed-forward) setup, it is not stronger than the AFAIK single-mic QC20.

I've auditioned the 1000X extensively against the QC35, and while the contest is much closer, I also take issue with the kind of ANC silence Sony's chosen. To me subjectively it's a poor choice, compared to Bose's more conventional thing, it's just not very pleasant and gets penetrated very easily.

There's a whole chorus of people out there who are very defiant about the 1000X being better than the QC35. Me, I think they need to remember not every ear hears the same.

I wonder if Sony's perhaps lost their previous ANC engineers because there's such a break in their attitude to the design decisions in here. And the new crew are so inexperienced they've made all kinds of amateur mistakes, down to the basics like interface, weight balance and pad choice.

These Sony products are built to look good on PowerPoint and wow on first contact, full to the brim with gimmicks and acronyms. However if measured, or even just thrown against enough noise, the bubble bursts right away. One may even say given Sony's history (claiming first to the consumer ANC market ahead of Bose, cough cough), they ought to be more creative than simply copy Bose's "product mix," but that requires a post of its own.

Thanks for letting me vent and I hope I've managed to be helpful to the discourse in some way.

wertzius's picture

I am not sure if you can measure the NC capabilities of the Sony in a simple way. The Sony uses 3 different NC modes: Plane, Office and Bus/Train. In each mode it blocks other frequencies. That is one reason why you should start the NC calibration when your enviroment has changed.

The bluetooth capabilities of the Sony are a little bit underwhelming. You can only use one device for a role (media/phoning) at a time but ibgot used to it.

Overall i love the Sony ;-)

Spankey00's picture

I actually prefer my Beats Studio 3 to both the Sony and Bose by overcoming the weak points of both.

While I do prefer the Bose over the Sony, I still don't love them. They will mostly be used for the beach as they are very lightweight and still can't be beat for comfort.

meringo's picture

If I were to buy a mustang for 25k and a Jaguar F-type for 200k, then compare them, my guess is that the F-type would come out on top. But if I were to compare them again, restricting the Mustang to 20mph, I bet my feelings may be compleatly different. Why the heck would you review the 1000x without testing/evaluating LDAC -- That huge selling point that makes a drastic difference. Please add something in, as this whole review is kind of shot without it. Also -- The NC measurements are not as solid as suggested... Your testing environment is a testing environment. I don't know about you, but I use my headphones in the streets, on trains, on airplanes.... I didn't know you could replicate those conditions so well in a lab! I usually love and respect the reviews/comparisons here, but this one is really messed up.